Which AI labs publish an RSS feed, and which make you scrape
We checked all of them the boring way, by asking for the feed and seeing what came back.
To keep the news page current we fetch twenty-three sources every fifteen minutes. Setting that up meant asking every lab for a feed and writing down what came back. Here is the list, because it's genuinely useful if you want to follow this stuff yourself.
They have a feed and it works
OpenAI publishes at openai.com/news/rss.xml. It's a big one, well over a thousand items, and the old /blog/rss.xml redirects to it.
Google DeepMind has deepmind.google/blog/rss.xml. It's clean RSS with one catch: the description field is empty on every item, so you get a headline and a link and nothing else.
Google's own AI blog is at blog.google/innovation-and-ai/technology/ai/rss/. The path you'd guess redirects to that one.
Mistral has mistral.ai/news/rss. It's valid RSS served with the wrong content type, so some readers refuse it. It's fine, it just says plain text on the label.
They don't, and it's not close
Anthropic has no feed. Not at /rss.xml, not linked in the page head, not anywhere we could find. The posts are in the page, buried in the data the site ships to build itself, so that's where we read them from.
Meta has no feed either, at any of the four paths worth trying. Its AI blog also does something odd: ask for the page as a browser and you get an error shell with no posts in it, ask as anything else and the posts are right there in the HTML. We read it the second way.
xAI and Cursor both publish changelogs and news as ordinary web pages with no feed attached, so both get read as pages.
The bits everyone gets right
GitHub gives every repo a releases feed by adding .atom to the releases URL. That covers Claude Code, Codex and the official Python libraries, and it's the most reliable thing in the whole list.
Status pages are the other easy one. Both OpenAI and Anthropic run on statuspage.io, and every statuspage site has a /history.rss. That's what sits behind our is-it-down pages.
Deprecation pages are the hard case
Nobody publishes a feed of models being retired, which is a shame, because it's the announcement most likely to break something you built. Both OpenAI and Anthropic keep the information on a normal documentation page.
So we take a copy of the page every fifteen minutes and compare it with the last one. When a line appears or disappears, that's the item. It's crude and it catches copy edits as well as real changes, which is why the page shows you the changed lines instead of telling you what they mean.
What this means if you just want to keep up
Four working feeds, from three companies, and you can follow those in any reader today. The rest you can't, unless someone else does the scraping. That's most of the reason this site exists, and our own feed carries all of them in one place, with one per lab if you only care about a single one.
Every claim above was checked by fetching the URL, including the ones that 404ed. If a lab quietly ships a feed later we'll notice, because we're still asking.