Reflection releases Beam's 501 billion parameter weights under Apache 2.0
Reflection pitches Beam on how few tokens it spends, and the first outside test backs that up but finds it hallucinates often.
On October 16, 2026, Reflection put the weights of Beam, its first model, on Hugging Face under an Apache 2.0 license. Reflection says developers can download it, host it themselves and customize it for their own work.
Beam is a mixture-of-experts model with 501 billion parameters, 23 billion of them active at a time. Reflection announced it on October 5 and promised the weights "later this month," so it beat its own deadline by about two weeks.
- Size
- 501 billion total parameters, 23 billion active
- License
- Apache 2.0
- Weights
- BF16, FP8, and NVFP4
- Context window
- 1M tokens
- Announced
- October 5, 2026
What Reflection says it's good at
Reflection built Beam for coding and agent work, and it sells the model on efficiency more than on top scores. In the October 5 post, the company says Beam scores about the same as GLM-5.2 on advanced reasoning tests while using 3 to 4 times less inference compute. It doesn't claim the lead:
Where frontier open models like Kimi K3 remain ahead on raw capability, Beam's advantage is efficiency at inference time.
The efficiency came from how it was trained. Reflection used "a controllable length penalty that rewards successful solutions while discouraging unnecessary tokens." Early on, scores rose while answers got shorter. Later, as Beam got better at agent tasks, its answers grew again. Users pick the tradeoff themselves (there's a reasoning effort setting for it).
What an outside test found
Artificial Analysis, one of the groups Reflection thanks for testing Beam before release, posted its own scores the same morning, at 9:31 am Eastern. They're more mixed than Reflection's tables, and more specific.
Reflection’s first model, Beam, scores 30 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, placing it #2 among US open weights models Beam is an open weights model with 501B total and 23B active parameters, released on @huggingface Congratulations to @reflection_ai on the release! Key takeaways: ➤ Second among US open weights models: Beam scores 30, behind only Meta's Muse Spark Open (39) and ahead of yesterday’s NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (26) release. Outside China, only Muse Spark Open and the UAE's K2 Horizon (31) score higher ➤ Token efficient for its intelligence: Beam uses ~26k output tokens per Intelligence Index task compared to K2 Horizon, one point ahead, which uses twice as many (~52k). Proprietary models still set the frontier, with GPT-6 Astra (max) scoring 53 on the same budget (~27k) ➤ Strong on agentic workflows, weaker in the terminal: Beam scores 48.5% on AutomationBench-AA, 11 percentage points ahead of K2 Horizon (37.2%) and level with Qwen3.8 27B (48.2%). Terminal-Bench 4.0 is a weak point, where Beam scores 3.0%, behind Qwen3.8 27B (5.6%) and Muse Spark Open (8.1%) ➤ Knows more, guesses more: On AA-Omniscience it answers 33% of questions correctly, well ahead of K2 Horizon (18%) and Qwen3.8 27B (16%). But its hallucination rate is 47%, against 26% for K2 Horizon and 30% for Qwen3.8 27B, giving Beam a net index score of 1.5, ahead of both peers (−3.0 and −10.0) Other model details Context window: 1M tokens Modalities: Text Parameters: 501B / 23B
So the token count backs up Reflection's pitch. Beam used about 26,000 output tokens per task, half of what the UAE's K2 Horizon needed for a score one point higher. The hallucination rate cuts the other way: 47%, against 26% and 30% for the two models it was compared with.
Terminal work is weak. Beam scored 3.0% on Terminal-Bench 4.0 in that test. Reflection's own table reports 80.1 on an older version, Terminal Bench v2.1, so I wouldn't set the two numbers side by side.
How big the training run was
Reflection pretrained Beam on 23.8 trillion tokens using 6,144 NVIDIA GB300 GPUs, in under four weeks. The reinforcement learning run after that used 10,500 GB300s for another four weeks and produced more than 100 million rollouts.
We believe this is one of the largest scale RL runs conducted by any open lab to date.
Where you can run it
Besides the three weight formats, there's a small drafter model for speculative decoding. vLLM, SGLang and Transformers support Beam from the first day, and Ollama, OpenRouter and the big cloud platforms are on Reflection's list of hosts. Dell and HPE sell it for machines kept behind a company's firewall.
Reflection also open-sourced Mirror CLI, the terminal harness it trained Beam alongside. Recipes for self-distillation, a way to tune Beam on your own tasks, are due "in the coming days." The company says it's already training the next model in the series.
More on Open weights
- Mistral previews Large 4, a 1 trillion-parameter model, and says weights come by month's endOctober 6, 2026
- Alibaba says Qwen ran a month of self-improvement unattended, and plans a 10-trillion-parameter modelSeptember 23, 2026
- Qwen models explained: Qwen3.8 Max, Flash and 27B, open weights vs API, with release datesSeptember 23, 2026
- Intrinsic open-sourced the robot control stack it uses in real manufacturing deployments, under Apache 2.0September 22, 2026

